There was only one catch and that was Catch-22
April 01, 2005 | co.mments
From the Joseph Heller school of specification:
"We define Binary XML as a format which does not conform to the XML specification yet maintains a well-defined, useful relationship with XML."
To which I say: LOL.
Tim Bray and Elliotte Harold are not as amused as I am by the looks of things. Tim thinks these folks are heading down a slippery slope: I wager that slope begins with the Infoset. Amy Lewis has the best comment so far:
"There seems to be an off-by-one error in the URI"
April 1, 2005 11:26 PM
Post a comment
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference There was only one catch and that was Catch-22:
» You don't have to be mad to work with markup... from Raw
Binary XML. I don't really have a lot to say on the matter - I know folks can do wonderful things with ASN.1 and XML, but if I wanted to make a binary data exchange format I probably wouldn't start with something doc-oriented like XML (/Infoset). Wha... [Read More]
Tracked on April 2, 2005 09:51 AM